NOTE: Let us not be fooled….. even when the President accepts the resignation of Van Jones that he will ask for, Van Jones will still have the ear of the President, just not the paycheck. Remember, Valerie Jarrett, who is like a sister to Obama, said they have been following the “career” of Van Jones since his Oakland (Communism) days!!
Van Jones: At this point. The end of the occupation. The right of return of the Palestinian people. These are critical dividing lines in human rights. We have to be here. No American would put up with an Israeli-style occupation of their hometown for 53 days let alone 54 years. US tax dollars are funding violence against people of color inside the US borders and outside the US borders. Van Jones sounds like fellow Jew-haters Bill Ayers, Rashid Khalidi, and Jeremiah Wright.
What a shock.
Is it really that surprising that Barack Obama put him in charge of the Cap and Trade legislation?
For more: http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/09/unreal-van-jones-even-released-war.html
Just Americans Making Ethical Statements Weblog 
2 comments
Comments feed for this article
September 5, 2009 at 3:33 pm
mrje
I am thrilled and full of HOPE that the TRUTH will come out…
Where is the NO SPIN ZONE for these guys????
September 5, 2009 at 5:22 pm
Interested Bystander
Hey All,
In my opinion Obama should be held accountable for his decision to appoint this man to a “Cabinet” position. I comment “Cabinet”, because that’s basically what these “Czar” appointments are. The big difference is that these “Czar” positions do not have to be confirmed by the Senate.
But also, the media, who has given Obama a “pass” when it comes to his appointments, bears some responsibility. The job of “news” agencies is to keep the public informed. That’s why we buy newspapers, and again, in my opinion, one of the biggest reasons that newspapers are a dying breed, is because they have gotten away from reporting the “news”, and papers now are filled with “opinion” pieces, with more “description” of certain types of people, then simply giving us the facts.
The papers should have been all over this. You can’t tell me that they didn’t know about this man, because Michael Savage was telling us about this man a quarter of a year ago. I don’t listen to Savage, so I, along with many other people was left uninformed about this appointment.
These appointments affect EVERY American, and we should be informed on ALL of Obama’s appointments, whether they are Senate confirmed or “Czars”.
On a related subject (transparency), this Administration has been one of the most secretive Administrations in a very long time. It reminds me of the Nixon Administration after Watergate broke.
Can someone tell me what is the “security” issue surrounding who visits the White House? I’d suggest that 90% of visitors to the White House are NOT “security” related visits. Why won’t Obama release the visitor logs of the White House? If someone is “security” related, just redact that name. How hard would that be? They do that all of the time with CIA reports, and the like, so why can’t this “transparent” Administration just redact those names, and release the logs?
Now Obama says that the logs WILL be released, but wait, there’s a little “blip” in this so called “release” of these logs, and that would be that they won’t be released until a time frame of 3 to 6 months have passed. Oh wait, there’s one more “blip” that being that the logs from the first 8 months of this Administration won’t be released at all.
Read the article here:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32447886/ns/politics-white_house/
Believe it or not, MSNBC has the article. They spin the article to pat the President’s back for cutting a deal with a group that had filed suit to have ALL of the logs released.
If you can’t see through the “fog”, and hold this man accountable for the “promises” he made claiming that he would have the most “transparent” Administration in history, then you have your head in the sand.
Here is a sample of what I am trying to point out:
Having the most “transparent” Administration in history:
“Just words”
“I will allow the bill to sit on my desk for five days before signing it, so the American people can see what the Government is passing”:
“Just words”
The pledge to go “line by line” on any budget bill to cut out any earmarks:
“Just words”
The many times he told interviewers that a “public option” was an integral part of any health care reform:
“Just words”
The pledge that he would not raise taxes on the middle class, “Not your income tax, not your capital gains tax, not ANY tax”:
“Just words”
Obama saying that it wasn’t his desire to own car companies:
“Just words”
Saying that he and Ayers were just “neighbors who seen each other on the street”:
“Just words”
The list is just about endless, as to what Obama has “pledged”, and what he has actually done.
Does anyone other than me, see a pattern in Obama? How many times does he get to get away with saying one thing, and then doing exactly what he said he WOULDN’T do?
When does Obama start to be held accountable? The “Bush did it” argument is getting old. Does Obama get to ride that argument for another 3 and a quarter years?
I guess they have that “racist” argument in their back pocket, and that card can be shown at any time, just look at what this Administration is trying to do to the “Tea Party” movement folks.
I am not scared, because the American people are a whole bunch smarter than Obama, Emanuel, and Axelrod think we are. But this man, at least so far, is Jimmy Carter times ten.
I get the sense that he doesn’t have a clue.