You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘National Rifle Association’ tag.

“I don’t know why any individual should have a right to have a revolver in his house,” Nixon said in a taped conversation with aides. “The kids usually kill themselves with it and so forth.” He asked why “can’t we go after handguns, period?”

For full article: http://news.yahoo.com/ap-enterprise-nixon-wished-total-handgun-ban-175805078.html

Advertisements
Gun manufacturer Ruger is overwhelmed with orders and had to suspend taking any new ones.
 

“Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (NYSE: RGR), announced today that for the first quarter 2012, the Company has received orders for more than one million units.”

“Therefore, the Company has temporarily suspended the acceptance of new orders.”

     Is this the example of the National Rifle Association’s quid pro quo?

NRA tells board members they’re not to speak out or testify against Kagan’s SCOTUS nomination.  Is this part of  the deal they cut for getting their carve-out of the “DISCLOSE ACT” bill?

http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/06/27/nra-issues-gag-order-to-its-board-members-on-elena-kagan/

Classy: NYT invokes suicide of Rep. Stupak’s son to make point about gun control

By: Mark Hemingway
Commentary Staff Writer
01/07/10 12:55 PM EST

The New York Times has a profile of Bart Stupak, the Michigan Democrat who’s pro-life stance has made him a thorn in his party’s side throughout the health care debate. Incredibly, here’s the second paragraph of the story:

After his younger son committed suicide in 2000, using the congressman’s gun, Mr. Stupak soon resumed his predawn commute to Washington and his solid voting record with the National Rifle Association.

What is the point here? Is it that Rep. Stupak is contradictory? That he’s stubborn? Unreflective? Let’s try a thought experiment here:

After his younger son died driving recklessly in 2000, using the congressman’s car, Mr. Stupak soon resumed his predawn commute to Washington and his solid voting record in support of Michigan’s auto manufacturers.

Yes, that paragraph would be pretty stupid — but logically it’s no different than the paragraph the Times included about guns. It’s too much for the Times to accept that Stupak’s stance on guns is consistent with U.S. Constitution, but they should at least accept that Stupak represents a huge rural district in Northern Michigan, a place where owning guns is often a matter of survival and is deeply embedded in the culture there. Further, Stupak is a former state trooper. His son’s suicide aside, I imagine he posesses a wealth of first-hand experience about the dangers of guns and that has most certainly informed his thinking as a legislator.

I don’t know whether the Times reporter is just oblivious or very petty. But the suggestion Stupak’s stance on guns is contradictory in light of his son’s suicide is beyond the pale.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Classy-NYT-invokes-suicide-of-Rep-Stupaks-son-to-make-point-about-gun-control-80918037.html

“One northern Warren County resident found out recently the government is paying attention to such ammunition sales.”

”West said a customer of his recently stocked up on .223-caliber rounds, a caliber often used in assault-style weapons. The customer bought 1,000 rounds a few months ago through a mail order company.”

“Shortly after the purchase, he received a visit from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, whose interest was apparently piqued by a large-scale purchase of that caliber.

“His wife was home. He was at church,” West said.”

For the Full article: http://www.poststar.com/articles/2009/03/20/news/local/14551013.txt

Obama’s Gun Ban List Is Out

 

Alan Korwin
GunLaws.com
Friday, March 13, 2009

Here it is, folks, and it is bad news. The framework for legislation is always laid, and the Democrats have the votes to pass anything they want to impose upon us. They really do not believe you need anything more than a brick to defend your home and family. Look at the list and see how many you own. Remember, it is registration, then confiscation. It has happened in the UK, in Australia, in Europe, in China, and what they have found is that for some reason the criminals do not turn in their weapons, but will know that you did.

Remember, the first step in establishing a dictatorship is to disarm the citizens.

Gun-ban list proposed. Slipping below the radar (or under the short-term memory cap), the Democrats have already leaked a gun-ban list, even under the Bush administration when they knew full well it had no chance of passage (HR 1022, 110th Congress). It serves as a framework for the new list the Brady’s plan to introduce shortly. I have an outline of the Brady’s current plans and targets of opportunity. It’s horrific. They’re going after the courts, regulatory agencies, firearms dealers and statutes in an all out effort to restrict we the people. They’ve made little mention of criminals. Now more than ever, attention to the entire Bill of Rights is critical. Gun bans will impact our freedoms under search and seizure, due process, confiscated property, states’ rights, free speech, right to assemble and more, in addition to the Second Amendment. The Democrats current gun-ban-list proposal (final list will be worse):

Rifles (or copies or duplicates):
M1 Carbine,
Sturm Ruger Mini-14,
AR-15,
Bushmaster XM15,
Armalite M15,
AR-10,
Thompson 1927,
Thompson M1;
AK,
AKM,
AKS,
AK-47,
AK-74,
ARM,
MAK90,
NHM 90,
NHM 91,
SA 85,
SA 93,
VEPR;
Olympic Arms PCR;
AR70,
Calico Liberty ,
Dragunov SVD Sniper Rifle or Dragunov SVU,
Fabrique National FN/FAL,
FN/LAR, or FNC,
Hi-Point20Carbine,
HK-91,
HK-93,
HK-94,
HK-PSG-1,
Thompson 1927 Commando,
Kel-Tec Sub Rifle;
Saiga,
SAR-8,
SAR-4800,
SKS with detachable magazine,
SLG 95,
SLR 95 or 96,
Steyr AU,
Tavor,
Uzi,
Galil and Uzi Sporter,
Galil Sporter, or Galil Sniper Rifle ( Galatz ).
Pistols (or copies or duplicates):
Calico M-110,
MAC-10,
MAC-11, or MPA3,
Olympic Arms OA,
TEC-9,
TEC-DC9,
TEC-22 Scorpion, or AB-10,
Uzi.
Shotguns (or copies or duplicates):
Armscor 30 BG,
SPAS 12 or LAW 12,
Striker 12,
Streetsweeper. Catch-all category (for anything missed or new designs):
A semiautomatic rifle that accepts a detachable magazine and has:
(i) a folding or telescoping stock,
(ii) a threaded barrel,
(iii) a pistol grip (which includes ANYTHING that can serve as a grip, see
below),
(iv) a forward grip; or a barrel shroud.
Any semiautomatic rifle with a fixed magazine that can accept more than
10 rounds (except tubular magazine .22 rim fire rifles).
A semiautomatic pistol that has the ability to accept a
detachable magazine, and has:
(i) a second pistol grip,
(ii) a threaded barrel,
(iii) a barrel shroud or
(iv) can accept a detachable magazine outside of the pistol grip, and
(v) a semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10
rounds.
A semiautomatic shotgun with:
(i) a folding or telescoping stock,
(ii) a pistol grip (see definition below),
(iii) the ability to accept a detachable magazine or a fixed magazine capacity
of more than 5 rounds, and
(iv) a shotgun with a revolving cylinder.
Frames or receivers for the above are included, along with conversion kits.
Attorney General gets carte blanche to ban guns at will: Under the proposal, the U.S. Attorney General can add any “semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General.”

Note that Obama’s pick for this office, Eric Holder, wrote a brief in the Heller case supporting the position that you have no right to have a working firearm in your own home. In making this determination, the bill says, “there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States military or any law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a shall not be determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event.” In plain English this means that ANY firearm ever obtained by federal officers or the military is not suitable for the public.

The last part is particularly clever, stating that a firearm doesn’t have a sporting purpose just because it can be used for sporting purpose — is that devious or what? And of course, “sporting purpose” is a rights infringement with no constitutional or historical support whatsoever, invented by domestic enemies of the right to keep and bear arms to further their cause of disarming the innocent.

Respectfully submitted, Alan Korwin, Author Gun Laws of America http://www.gunlaws.com/gloa.htm

Forward or send to every gun owner you know…
Watch This, If You Want More Proof:
YouTube – CNN- Obama To BAN Guns SPREAD THIS FOLKS, PLZ!

A partial list of gun rights groups:

Gun Owners of America
http://gunowners.org/

Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership
http://www.jpfo.org/

FREEDOM=GUNS
http://www.tcsn.net/doncicci/freedom.htm

National Rifle Association
http://www.nra.org/

Second Amendment Committee
http://www.libertygunrights.com/

Second Amendment Foundation
http://www.saf.org/

Second Amendment Sisters
http://www.2asisters.org/

Women Against Gun Control
http://www.wagc.com/
 

Research related articles:

  1. Bamalot: Obama Drafts Star-Studded Short List for Cabinet
  2. Man arrested with rifle said he had delivery for Obama
  3. U.S. terrorism watch list tops 1 million
  4. Rahm Emanuel, if you are on No Fly List, No Gun!
  5. CNN reporter criticizes TSA, finds self on terror watch list
  6. Ludicrous Terrorist Watch List Now Contains Over 1 Million Names
  7. Secret List of U.S. Military Bases to Replace Gitmo
  8. Are You On the Terror Watch List? Good Luck Getting Off It
  9. 2008 Bohemian Grove Guest List Obtained By 9/11 Truth Activists
  10. Bill to help remove people remove themselves from TSA watch list passes House
  11. Airport Gestapo: How Bush’s No Fly List is Making Americans Unsafe
  12. Mistakes on Terrorist Watch List Affect Even Children

 

 

Advertisements