You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Larry Sinclair’ tag.

In February of 2014, it will mark SIX years since Larry Sinclair released his infamous video in which he alleged that he had a sexual and drug encounter with Barack Obama when Obama was a State Senator in Illinois. To many who have followed Larry Sinclair, his story never wavered, and he was subjected to the Left’s venomous use of cyber attacks to persecute him. In his book “Barack Obama: Coke Sex Lies & Murder“, Sinclair details the encounter with Obama as well as chronicled the attacks on him during the 2008 Presidential campaign. Given some of the things that Sinclair has pursued in revealing his story, his YouTube probably saved his life.

Anyways, now entering the stage, is Mia Marie Pope, who alleges to be a former classmate of Obama:

Washington: A woman, who claims to have been a classmate of Barack Obama, said that the president was gay and used cocaine in school.

In a bizarre interview, Mia Marie Pope told right-wing preacher James David Manning that she believes Obama was not only active within the gay community, but also a heavy cocaine user during his years in Hawaii.

Pope said that Obama always portrayed himself as a foreign student, adding that girls were never anything that he ever was interested in, but he would get along with older white gay men. She added that Obama at that time was also procuring his cocaine, the Huffington Post reports.

She then noted that Obama was having sex with these older white guys and that’s how he was getting this cocaine to be able to freebase, the report added.

HHmm.. wonder if she can stand up to the heat like Larry has!! Look out, here comes kStreet67 and Democratista!!


So does anyone want to dispute the claims of Larry Sinclair:

KC — During Barack Obama’s tenure as the president of the Harvard Law Review in the late 1980s, at least two male student editors complained to colleagues and senior university officials about inappropriate behavior by Obama, ultimately leaving their positions at the journal, multiple sources confirm to THE KANSAS CITIAN.

The men complained of sexually suggestive behavior by Obama that made them angry and uncomfortable, the sources said, and they signed agreements with the university that gave them financial payouts to leave the journal. The agreements also included language that bars the men from talking about their departures.

In a series of comments over the past 10 days, Obama and his administration repeatedly declined to respond directly about whether he ever faced allegations of sexual harassment at the journal. They have also declined to address questions about specific reporting confirming that there were financial settlements in two cases in which men leveled complaints.

for full article:

from SinclairNews via the Blaze:

Kids say the darndest things. But sometimes they say shocking things.

On Thursday, 9-year-old Brandon did the latter when he was asked why he wanted President Barack Obama to win a second term outside a campaign rally featuring First Lady Michelle Obama in Daytona, Fla.

“Because if Mitt Romney win, we’ll be going back to the crop fields,” Brandon said, referring to the days of slavery. “We’ll be picking crops.”

The father can be heard off-camera laughing. Obviously, no 9-year-old child would determine through their own reasoning that GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney would send African-Americans “back to the crop fields.”

“We need Obama to win, because Obama was our president for how many years? Three years. And we need him to win because he’s a good president,” the boy added.

see the rest of the story and video @ and SinclairNews.Net


A political website that contained stinging criticism of the Obama administration and its handling of the Fast and Furious scandal was ordered to be shut down by the Obama campaign’s ‘Truth Team’, according to private investigator Douglas Hagmann, who was told by ISP GoDaddy his site contained information that was “maliciously harmful to individuals in the government.”

Hagmann, CEO of Hagmann Investigative Services, Inc., a private investigative agency serving a roster of Fortune 500 clients, was given 48 hours by GoDaddy to find a new home for his website before it was deleted.

Hagmann was told the reason for the shut down was because the website featured “morally objectionable” material. After GoDaddy refused to identify the complainant, only saying that it was not “any official government agency,” further investigation by Hagmann revealed that the order came from a group tied to Obama campaign headquarters.

for article:

Note: I think Larry Sinclair has lost track of the number of times his ISP’s were bullied into shutting him down!!

From World Net Daily:

Two recent developments have bolstered a campaign by Larry Sinclair to advance the sensational claim in his 2009 book “Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder” that he and Barack Obama twice engaged in homosexual acts accompanied by cocaine use.

On May 17, lawyers representing Internet bookselling giant filed a brief in federal district court arguing that Sinclair’s book is not defamatory.

Last week, Robert Braddock Jr. – the Democratic Party operative who taped the lie detector test administered to Sinclair in February 2008 – was indicted in an unrelated matter by federal authorities and charged with conspiring to conceal campaign donations.

Braddock’s polygraph concluded Sinclair was lying.

But Sinclair continues to insist the charges in his book against Obama are true and that he has been a victim of a White House-organized campaign to discredit him.

For full article:

It is fair to note that despite all of the online cyberattacks and the attacks on him personally, Larry Sinclair has never waivered in his allegations.

At about this time four years ago, in the heat of the Democratic primaries, many of us saw how the Obama campaign utilized the “Alinsky” tactics to combat the story of one Larry Sinclair, who was alleging to have had a sexual encounter with Barack Obama, which also included some drug use. The power of the internet, through the bloggers, was unleashed on Mr. Sinclair with the full force of what one would an empire protecting its leader. There was no concern whatsoever for the legitimacy of the cyberattacks on Mr. Sinclair or anyone in his life. A weaker person would have folded under the intense online pressure that was targeted at Mr. Sinclair. (But the details will make interesting reading when Mr. Sinclair publishes his next book)

Fast forward, and we now see how the Obama campaign is employing the same tactics against the big donors of his opponent, Mitt Romney. They are digging for any tidbit of information to publicly humiliate these private citizens, and have now employed the media, including, to be their accomplices.

But even more troublesome is the use of the blogosphere to terrorize individuals, to ruin their lives, for no apparent reason other than a differing opinion.

Here is the story of a Deputy District Attorney in LA who has been the target of ONE BLOGGER, and how the internet has been used to sabotage his entire life:

In the last radio interview Andrew Breitbart ever gave, on Hugh Hewitt’s radio show, Breitbart talked about a new ruthless tactic used by thugs against political opponents:

[O]ne of the things they’ve done to people who have worked with me in the past, including an L.A. prosecutor, is to “SWAT.” That means that they’re spoofing phones, pretending to be somebody else’s phone, calling 911, and saying “I killed somebody” and then the person’s home is met with the guns drawn, the SWAT and the helicopters, in a horrifying act. It’s happened twice: once in New Jersey, once in Los Angeles, with an L.A. County . . . prosecutor who [is] associated with me.”

I am that L.A. County prosecutor. And in this post, you’ll hear the hoax call that sent police to my house, pointing loaded guns at me.


At 12:35 a.m. on July 1, 2011, sheriff’s deputies pounded on my front door and rang my doorbell. They shouted for me to open the door and come out with my hands up.

When I opened the door, deputies pointed guns at me and ordered me to put my hands in the air. I had a cell phone in my hand. Fortunately, they did not mistake it for a gun.

They ordered me to turn around and put my hands behind my back. They handcuffed me. They shouted questions at me: IS THERE ANYONE ELSE IN THE HOUSE? and WHERE ARE THEY? and ARE THEY ALIVE?

I told them: Yes, my wife and my children are in the house. They’re upstairs in their bedrooms, sleeping. Of course they’re alive.

Deputies led me down the street to a patrol car parked about 2-3 houses away. At least one neighbor was watching out of her window as I was placed, handcuffed, in the back of the patrol car. I saw numerous patrol cars on my quiet street. There was a police helicopter flying overhead, shining a spotlight down on us as I walked towards the patrol car. Several neighbors later told us the helicopter woke them up. I saw a fire engine and an ambulance. A neighbor later told me they had a HazMat vehicle out on the street as well.

Meanwhile, police rushed into my home. They woke up my wife, led her downstairs and to the front porch, frisked her, and asked her where the children were. Then police ordered her to stand on the front porch with her hands against the wall while they entered my children’s bedrooms to make sure they were alive.

The call that sent deputies to my home was a hoax. Someone had pretended to be me. They called the police to say I had shot my wife. The sheriff’s deputies who arrived at my front door believed they were about to confront an armed man who had just shot his wife. I don’t blame the police for any of their actions. But I blame the person who made the call.

Because I could have been killed.

The weirdest part of the whole thing was that I halfway expected this might happen. Because I was not the first one it had happened to.

I think it’s about time you heard the call that sent police to my home.

For the Videos and the FULL ARTICLE:

from BrietbartTV:

A YouTube video uploaded on Monday afternoon apparently shows a schoolteacher from the Rowan-Salisbury school district in North Carolina informing a student that failing to be respectful of President Obama is a criminal offense. Breitbart News has uncovered that the student is a high school junior, and that the teacher is apparently one Tanya Dixon-Neely.



The video shows a classroom discussion about the Washington Post hit piece about Mitt Romney bullying a kid some five decades ago. One student says, “Didn’t Obama bully someone though?” The teacher says: “Not to my knowledge.” The student then cites the fact that Obama, in Dreams from My Father, admits to shoving a little girl. “Stop, no, because there is no comparison,” screams the teacher. Romney is “running for president. Obama is the president.”



The student responds that both are “just men.”The teacher yells — literally yells — that Obama is “due the respect that every other president is due … Listen,” she continues, “let me tell you something, you will not disrespect the president of the United States in this classroom.” She yells over the student repeatedly, and yells at him that it’s disrespect for him to even debate about Romney and Obama.


The student says that he can say what he wants.

“Not about him, you won’t,” says the teacher.

The teacher then tells the student – wrongly – that it is a criminal offense to say bad things about a president. “Do you realize that people were arrested for saying things bad about Bush? Do you realize you are not supposed to slander the president?”

The student says that it would violate First Amendment rights to jail someone for such sentiments. “You would have to say some pretty f’d up crap about him to be arrested,” says the student. “They cannot take away your right to have your opinion … They can’t take that away unless you threaten the president.”

Clearly, the student should be teaching the class, and the teacher should be reading the Constitution more often.

The school district classified the exchange – which is obviously just another case of a pro-Obama teacher shoveling her views down students’ throats – a “learning experience.” It isn’t. It’s political intimidation, and it’s just another example of how the American public school system has become an indoctrination tool for the left. This teacher should be suspended or fired forthwith, if only for incompetence.

UPDATE: Breitbart News has received information that the YouTube video was shot by a friend of the bullied student. According to our source, the student had asked his friend to record the discussion to “prove to his parents what he has been trying to tell them for some time. The teacher in this video has a long history of pushing a liberal agenda, by shouting down students. She is very intolerant of other points of view that she does not share. The atmosphere at this school is not very conducive to opposing views.”

The source continues, “The student’s parents have since taken him out of school and had him registered at another nearby school.”

This quote is allegedly attributed to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright in Edward Klein’s new Obama book, “The Amateur”. If the quote is legitimate, it speaks VOLUMES:

Klein also said Wright told him he “made it comfortable” for Obama to accept  Christianity without having to renounce his “Islamic background,” which Klein  said he has on tape.
Read more:

     It has been four years since “Larry Sinclair” posted his YouTube video from his home in Minnesota, stating that he had been intimate with Presidential candidate Barack Obama, and their encounters included cocaine. In the four years of brutal cyberbullying, which also included a trumped up arrest in Washington DC and some possible abuse of power in Delaware that had him incarcerated fr a while, Larry’s story has never faltered.

      His YouTube and experiences led to his book, Barack Obama and Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder?.

      Now, a year after Larry was hit with a $30 million dollar defamation lawsuit by Dan Parisi, who had arranged the “doctored” lie detector test of Larry after the YouTube, Sinclair has scored a vindicating victory. Representing himself, Larry took on the “big guns” of one of DC’s big firms, and despite all the legal acumen within the firm, they could not convince the Judge to pursue the case:

Today, February 28, 2012 (exactly one year to the day since Oral Arguments hearing on Motions to Dismiss) United States District Court Judge Richard J. Leon has GRANTED Motion to Dismiss (DKT #94  & 94-4-5) filed in Daniel Parisi, et al v Lawrence W. Sinclair “aka Larry Sinclair” et al on January 26, 2011.

for full article:

On A Side Note:

With four years gone by, where are they now:

kstreet67 (Sheila Bryant), justme aka democratista (Ruthie Kessler of Boston Univeristy), mzmolly, tubesockted, Scott Covington….. and oh so many others!

The gay-hating left outed Sheriff Paul Babau tonight.
It’s their favorite sport.
The “progressive” Phoenix New Times reported:

Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu — who became the face of Arizona border security nationally after he started stridently opposing illegal immigration — threatened his Mexican ex-lover with deportation when the man refused to promise never to disclose their years-long relationship, the former boyfriend and his lawyer tell New Times.

The latest of the alleged threats were made through Babeu’s personal attorney, who’s also running the sheriff’s campaign for Congress in District 4, the ex-lover says.

He says lawyer Chris DeRose demanded he sign an agreement that he would never breathe a word about the affair. But Jose (New Times is withholding his last name because Babeu and his attorney have challenged his legal status) refused.

The 34-year-old from central Mexico charges that the sheriff’s lawyer warned against mentioning the affair with Babeu. DeRose said gossip about Babeu would focus attention on Jose, attention that could result in his deportation, Jose says.

Melissa Weiss-Riner, Jose’s attorney, confirms her client’s account.

She says she spoke directly to the sheriff’s lawyer, DeRose, about the Babeu camp’s threats that Jose could be deported if he “revealed the relationship.” She says DeRose falsely claimed that Jose’s visa had expired.

“Jose came to our firm because he felt he was being intimidated, and he was in fear for his life,” Weiss-Riner says. “He wanted his legal rights protected.”

Babeu didn’t respond to requests for comment by publication time for this article, but his attorney, DeRose, says the dispute between Jose and the sheriff concerned Jose’s work on Babeu’s websites. He says Jose was a former volunteer who hacked into a campaign website.

DeRose didn’t immediately address the other claims against him and the sheriff, except to say, “I never threatened to deport anybody” and that “[Babeu’s] not threatening anybody.”

Informed of the situation, Nancy-Jo Merritt, a longtime Phoenix immigration attorney, says such a threat would be indicative of an “atmosphere that’s been created politically in this state, so that if you get angry at someone who is Hispanic, you immediately jump down to the level of threatening to deport him.

Sheriff Babeu is an outspoken critic of Attorney General Eric Holder and Barack Obama. Babeu called for a special counsel investigation on Attorney General Eric Holder for Fast and Furious in October. The left has been targeting him for years because of his tough stance on border security.

For full story and followup:

Note: As embarassing as Barney Frank could be in front of the cameras, his lifestyle was his choice. The only time it should be a question was when his lover was using his home for illegal purposes. That would be the case no matter the orientation. Same goes for Sheriif Babeau.