You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Devvy Kidd’ tag.




By: Devvy
March 16, 2009
© 2008 –

What? You can’t be serious, Devvy. We just had an election!

I’m dead serious. Only someone deeply buried in distractions like ‘March Madness, the ‘Octomom’ or Dancing with the Stars can’t see the situation for our republic is not only dire, everyday is a continuing nightmare.

Writers for have been putting out some of the best, hard hitting material the past few years that fully lays out the history behind how we got here, the players and the agenda. Denial time is over. There won’t be any change for true constitutional government as long as the same players remain in office. Oh, wait….didn’t I say that already?

Change not possible with same players
Operation Clean Sweep
The Women’s Vote in November
Insanity: Socialists, communists serving in Congress
Throw out all female members of Congress!
Hold your nose and vote syndrome
Voting Lesser of Two Evils Won’t Save America

And, yet, last November, with the exception of two dozen or so seats in the House, America voted back the SAME Congress. They rehired and rewarded the same body of inept buffoons and crooks who have taken us to ruin with the worst on the horizon.

Barring an unwise move to declare martial law and despite the shambles this country will be in by November 2010, the elections will go on. I ran for Congress twice. I know what a grueling undertaking it is and how it feels to be cheated by electronic ballot and counting machines. I also know you can’t become a candidate a few months ahead of an election unless you run as a write in where allowed.

Those who believe the blarney coming out of Obama’s mouth regarding the economy (it’s not so bad, really!) will be in shock by the end of this summer. A year from now they will be wetting themselves over what Congress is doing and will continue to do until they’re thrown out of office. There is still the monumental battle going on over Obama’s citizenship, which is not going to go away until two issues are resolved once and for all:

1. That a court determine whether Obama’s birth status having been governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948 prevents him from eligibility as a natural born citizen under Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the US Constitution.

2. That Obama produce his long form birth certificate, which must be verified by at least two independent forensic document examiners.

I continue to get email from Obama supporters who care nothing for the U.S. Constitution. Their comments are juvenile and laced with fear. What if that guy really did lie to the country? These foolish people call me ugly names; their email is laced with profanity. They can’t tell you one single legal fact about ‘natural born at birth,’ so they sling their limited vocabulary instead. It is Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro aka and so forth, who created this situation, not those who believe in the supreme law of the land.

The bottom line is this: Those who hate this republic are already in high gear to ram Obama’s Marxist ideology down our throats. I don’t care if they call themselves progressives or Democrats, their agenda is the same:

Unity ’09: Leftist Dem groups quietly align

“A broad coalition of left-leaning groups is quietly closing ranks into a new coalition, “Unity ’09,” aimed at helping President Barack Obama push his agenda through Congress. Conceived at a New York meeting before the November election, two Democrats familiar with the planning said, Unity ’09 will draw together money and grassroots organizations to pressure lawmakers in their home states to back White House legislation and other progressive causes. The online-based is a central player in the nascent organization, but other groups involved in planning Unity ’09 span a broad spectrum of interests, from the American Civil Liberties Union to the National Council of La Raza to Planned Parenthood, as well as labor unions and environmental groups.”

This isn’t about conservative v liberal or Democrat v Republican. It’s about America. About issues that effect every man, woman and child in this country. At the risk of repeating myself, the U.S. Constitution is not liberal, conservative, Republican, Democrat, black, white or anything else. It is a document that held our republic (we are not a democracy, folks) true for centuries until the destroyers infiltrated every level of government, political parties, colleges, universities and the media through out the land. Now, it’s nothing more than a prop in Washington, DC. (Goals of the Communist Party.)

While our republic goes through this time of insanity, pain and misery, we also have to formulate a critical path of planning for the future. I know, we’re all tired. Our guaranteed right to the pursuit of life, liberty and happiness has been stripped from us; every day it’s a new brush fire to put out. But, we also have to recognize there will be a tomorrow no matter how bloodied and bruised we are when we get there.

The one world advocates are seeing their plans beginning to turn into uncontrollable meltdown and it will only get worse as they attempt to ‘globalize’ everything including toilets. Their solutions are no such thing except more attempts to bring us under world government. The upside is that Americans are reaching the point of beyond angry. The down side is we still have to make every effort to stop each and every piece of legislation coming out of CON-gress and the state houses that violate the U.S. and state constitutions.

There are literally thousands of very constitutionally oriented groups in this country. I try to give exposure to as many as I can, but ultimately, it is up to you and me to combine our efforts within our counties and state and get activated now. How?

First, get out of denial if you’re a Republican. Did your congress critter make any effort to abolish the Federal Reserve, the federal income tax or any of the unconstitutional cabinets and agencies since they’ve been in office? Has your member of Congress led the charge to get US out of the unconstitutional NAFTA, CAFTA, WTO treaties and membership in the communist run United Nations? If they haven’t, they don’t deserve to stay in Congress because Democrat or Republican, these tools of world government king pins and multi-national corporations who buy the favors of Congress (both parties) have all but destroyed our most critical job sectors (manufacturing, industrial, agriculture). Both party machines and long time incumbents have sold us out and now with the economy getting last rites, they are going to seek your support in 2010 using “the other side” as the excuse while ignoring all true constitutional solutions (Ron Paul’s bills).

Oh, wait! Mine is pro-life. Fine. So am I, but I will not excuse an incumbent just for that reason alone. There are pro-life challengers to these incumbents on your ticket every election. I ran against a career incumbent, the incompetent, bungling idiot, Wally Herger. We are both pro-life. The special interest groups in the Republican Party wanted Herger, the common man and woman came out for my candidacy – from all walks of life and professions. The corporate owned newspapers endorsed the lackey. In the end, the machines contradicted the support and limited polls; Herger was declared the winner two minutes after the polls closed. While we were both Republicans, I ran as a constituionalist. Herger voted for NAFTA and GATT. By his own admission, he never read either bill.

Here’s something voters need to think about: You can have two Republicans on the ticket during a primary. Both can be pro life, but the incumbent in Congress has to go. No more chances for an incumbent who has been in office 2, 4, 8, or 12 terms. Look where they’ve taken us as a body of “lawmakers.” Change is NOT possible with the same players. STOP making excuses: It is your congress critter and mine. The current incumbents no more believe in “smaller government” than I believe the earth is flat. It’s hogwash.

Start with your party at the local level; Republican, Democrat, Constitution Party or others. Attend the meetings and start talking. Someone will step up and say, I am qualified. I want to run and I need your support.

The groups below have memberships, same as Gun Owners of America and so forth. They hold meetings, they send out alerts. They network throughout the states. We the people go to gun shows, fairs, speeches and churches. Yes, so many of these excellent groups like NumbersUSA and others are tax exempt operations and can’t endorse candidates. However, they can talk outside that restriction at meetings, using telephone trees, conferences and conventions. Here’s a few:

The Committees of Safety (I am an unpaid Board member as we all are) is growing. The four top issues are listed on the web site.
Truth is focused on the income tax
Agenda 21 and related groups
The Paragon Foundation
The Virginia Land Rights Coalition

The thousands of groups in this country need to network with other organizations. Start talking about the need to identify a candidate for district such and such in your county and state. Call talk radio, am/fm bands as well as Internet and satellite. Call my radio show and I’ll dedicate a few minutes every night to announce good candidates so you know in your area. Urge other talk show hosts to do the same thing. Let’s use our air waves, not to just groan and vent, but to unite our country. The “meet up” groups for Ron Paul’s campaign were in the thousands. Do what brings success.

Get the word out that it’s time to find a candidate and get busy. I know from experience it takes more than a year to get out there and run a campaign. America will be ready for real leadership by next summer. The time will be ripe for booting out all these incumbents. Don’t wait because each state has a drop dead date for a candidate to file. It can be as long as one year and one day before election day. By next summer, people will be clamoring for these incumbents heads. If no one has stepped up and registered as a candidate before the deadline, guess what? You’ll get the same incumbent (either party). The socialists and communists in the Democrat Party are already gearing up for 2010. Will those who call themselves constitutionalists be left behind, again? “Third” party candidates are getting elected at various levels of government.




We also have to be realistic. In some districts, you will not be able to oust some of the crooks who’ve been parked on the public dole for decades (John Conyers, Maxine Waters, Charlie Rangel, Carolyn McCarthy, Rosa DeLauro, the Kennedy’s as a few examples) because those poltroons promise welfare and government dependency to a population that begs for mother government paid for by you. Certainly there are citizens in their districts who would like to throw them out of office, but until we change the hearts and minds of the American people towards liberty and freedom, I think the goal of removal is still a long shot in a number of districts.

Each and everyone one of us in a precinct that still uses ANY electronic gadgetry to cast and/or count the votes must do everything in our power to get rid of them. Paper ballots, hand counted in front of the public before AND after they go to the county clerk’s office. Hundreds of millions of dollars have been wasted on high technology that’s been robbing we the people of fair and impartial elections for decades. Look at the absurd circus in Minnesota over the Coleman race against jokster Al Franken. The election was November 4, 2008, and still no declared winner to hold an office under a law that doesn’t exist.

There are many fine, fine members of state legislatures and they need your support next year. Millions of Americans are encouraged by these Tenth Amendment or sovereignty bills that are sitting in more than two dozen states. We shall see how that goes as the votes come up and whether or not the states will stand their ground. A few weeks ago, I reported the vote in New Hampshire was 216 yeas and 150 nayes. This is what the record shows for H.C.R. 6; click here. This is the status of that bill; Inexpedient to Legislate. I have been told that a nay vote by Republicans was a good thing. Apparently, ‘Inexpedient to Legislate’ means do not vote on this. Even though the roll call showed 150 nay votes, nay didn’t mean nay as one would read the word. There is no notification or clarification that a nay vote is a good vote. I stand corrected.



Dr. Edwin Vieira has been working with the legislators in Montana on an honest money bill. I checked with him yesterday to see what I can do to help this effort. The bill is H.B. 639. The goal is to get this bill out of committee to a floor vote. Here is the information on the bill. Folks of Montana: PLEASE get on the phone to Rep. Wagner’s office, get the phone numbers of committee members and start calling. I’ll ask John Stokes at KGEZ 600 AM Z-600 The Edge, up in Kalispell, Montana to help get the word out.


Get on the phone today: We must stop H.R. 875 introduced by a real loon left over from the ’60s communes, Rosa DeLauro; see here and here for detailed information and data. This is one of the most draconian bills in decades and we must shout down the roof.

My guest tomorrow night will be Stewart Rhodes, Founder, Oath Keepers – Guardians of the Republic

Devvy on live radio: Solutions Not Politics
6:00 pm PST, 8:00 pm CST and 9:00 pm EST
Listen live:

I hate to say I wrote it so:
1 – Should Democratic Party merge with Communist Party?
2 – Democrats Shouldn’t Worry About Bush (Republicans Should…) (2000)
3 – Why Are Democrats Upset Over The Elections?
(2004 )

She has tried to tell you the ugly truth:
1 – Masters of Seduction (2000)

He also tried to tell you the truth:
1 – The Soviet Art of Brainwashing






By: Devvy
March 14, 2009
© 2008 –

Before I get into the how can we get this done, I would first like to make a statement to hopefully deflect an email box full of hate mail.

Please don’t misconstrue what I’m about to say as disparaging to any of the lawyers involved in these lawsuits. I have supported all of them and their efforts. I am not an attorney. I have no training in the law, but I can read and read I have. A million words in these lawsuits; the briefs as well as supporting documentation. That’s how I learn and hopefully make an informed decision. Not based on personalities, but what the law says.

Millions (not a thousand or a hundred thousand), but millions of Americans either know a lot about the Obama citizenship/birth certificate controversy or they know enough that it has raised serious questions in their mind.

Readers of this column and listeners to my radio show know that I have covered this extensively. They also know that I do not play favorites and would be fighting the same fight if McCain had allegedly been elected because McCain is also, in my opinion, constitutionally ineligible.

While some cases have received more attention than others, those receiving the most exposure have been cases filed by Phillip Berg, Dr. Orly Taitz, Leo Donofrio, Cort Wrotnoski, Stephen Pidgeon, Mario Apuzzo and the United States Justice Foundation. Dozens have been filed at the state level; too many to list here. Many of the cases have been brought by citizens and the rest by attorneys on behalf of their clients.

We are all aware of the outcome of those docketed to the U.S. Supreme Court (Denied with no comment on merit) and those that had at least a hearing of some sort in front of a judge. The issue of whether or not Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro aka and so forth, is badly dividing this country. The frustration and rage is escalating. Every piece of legislation he signs into law brings the potential of lawsuits that would be never ending – possibly thousands of them. Not to mention the destructive policies Obama is shoving down our throats. However, the issue at hand is not political or racial, but a matter of constitutional law.

Thousands of citizens have been doing everything humanly possible to get the courts to hear these cases on their merits. Of course, this is more than just a political hot potato, it is a volcano that could erupt in a nasty way. That’s why the courts won’t touch it – what judge wants to be responsible for removing an usurper president? Do they even have the legal authority to do so? An important question.

The situation can’t continue with another lawsuit filed on Monday, four on Wednesday, maybe three the following week. Then comes the endless wait while the defendants respond and the legal wrangling begins. When those fail in seven or eight weeks, a new round of lawsuits gets filed and again, months go by while the defendants answer the lawsuit and file motions that could go on for years. Leo speaks highly of Mario Apuzzo’s case, Kerchner v Obama and we hope it has a successful outcome. Mr. Apuzzo’s web site is here.

Obama has controlled the birth certificate issue from day one. He continues to do so. This keeps all of us wondering, filing Freedom of Information Act requests and lawsuits. I think even to the most staunch Obama supporter, it’s obvious by now that Obama refuses to release his vault birth certificate because he has something to hide. Or, maybe not. Maybe Obama’s refusal is simply to keep everyone running around chasing lawsuits. Remember, he can pull it out for release to the media anytime he wants. Timing in life is everything as they say – especially in politics.

There is also the issue of possible criminal activity by Obama and this is addressed on Orly’s web site where she is petitioning Attorney General Eric Holder for a special prosecutor; click here.

What do we do to bring this to an end as quickly as possible? I believe Orly was the first to bring up the issue of Quo Warranto, but I’m not 100% certain. There is so much activity and web sites to comb through besides reading all these legal filings. In any event, there are outstanding lawsuits waiting to be processed through the system. Many state representatives, active military and veterans have signed up to become plaintiffs for a possible lawsuit being initiated by Orly. They are all listed on her web site. Orly has also sent a letter of request to AG Eric Holder to undertake a Quo Warranto, as well as a new filing with the U.S. Supreme Court; click here.

Both Orly and Leo Donofrio were guests on my radio show last week to help us understand these legal issues. In a recent column, I provided a link to Leo’s three part hypothetical brief on Quo Warranto; click here. I concur that a Quo Warranto in the District Court in Washington, DC, FIRST is the best path to take, not the U.S. Supreme Court.

If you read the statute (see Leo’s brief), even if AG Holder and U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Taylor decline to proceed, there is still the opportunity to go forward. In Part 3 of Leo’s legal analysis, you will see where he gives the statute and who can have standing. This has been done successfully in the past when the AG and US Attorney have failed to act. We also have to remember that this will be a jury trial. My biggest concern is that an action taken straight to the U.S. Supreme Court – especially in light of the fact that the Chief Justice, John G. Roberts, met behind closed doors with Obama – would likely be shot down and we lose. Personally, I believe on the Quo Warranto issue, the U.S. Supreme Court should be last in line.

I know the knee jerk reaction to a jury trial in the District Court in Washington, DC, because I’ve already had email: “You’re dreaming, Devvy, if you think jurors in Washington, DC, who worship the Messiah are going to do the right thing.” My response is to let the system work and do not underestimate the integrity of the American people when presented with solid facts. That statute is perfect for this issue. It is up to the AG and the U.S. Attorney to bring an action on behalf of the United States. No plaintiffs. Should they refuse, then the “third persons” or “interested persons” part kicks in and we proceed from there.

Many, many Americans have been forwarding their letters of request to Holder the past couple of weeks; Orly has been posting them to her web site. Thank you to all the people who wrote letters to Richard Durbin. Every one counts. We know that hundreds of thousands have signed petitions to the courts. If hundreds of thousands of Americans from all walks of life sent their polite requests to Holder and Taylor (including all those state legislators), something has to give. A small flame can turn into a huge fire if fanned properly.


This pdf file is my certified letter to U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Taylor. I provided a copy to Richard Durbin at the U.S. Attorney’s office in Austin, Texas and U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald. That pdf file also contains Leo Donofrio’s letter of March 13, 2009, to U.S. Attorney Taylor. I put Leo’s letter in this pdf file to help people like me. I wear glasses and sometimes reading text off a web site with color back grounds makes it difficult on my old eyes.

I hope you will join me in sending U.S. Attorney Taylor a polite request to bring a Quo Warranto action. It is completely within either Holder or Taylor’s discretion. It can be one or the other or both of them. Time is of the essence and we simply must move this along to a resolution. The longer this lingers, the worst the situation will get for all of us and our republic.

Devvy on live radio: Solutions Not Politics
6:00 pm PST, 8:00 pm CST and 9:00 pm EST
Listen live:


United States Attorney Jeffrey Taylor
United States Attorney’s Office
555 4th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20530

Eric H. Holder Jr., Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001

Web sites on lawsuits:

Listing of cases and actions
Dr. Orly Taitz
Leo Donofrio
Phillip Berg
Mario Apuzzo
United States Justice Foundation
Stephen Pidgeon

Free audio:

Leo Donofrio legal filings and the Wong Kim Ark case

© 2009 – – All Rights Reserved