A Blog for Open Discourse
November 20, 2011 in Campaign 2008, Campaign 2010, Campaign 2012, Capitalism, Economy, Family values, Politics, socialism, Uncategorized | Tags: Barack Obama, Chris Matthews, John Kennedy, Michelle Obama, White House
For once, something to agree with Chris Matthews about:
Comments feed for this article
November 20, 2011 at 8:14 pm
“Tingles” Matthews has been talking about unhappy “Obama” a lot lately. Wondering out loud why he would even bother with a second term.
Makes one wonder what’s going on?
November 20, 2011 at 8:19 pm
OK, I just found this:
Another couple of Democrats wrote this.
I’m sensing that the Demos (wisely) are trying to nudge “Obama” out of running for a second term.
Even they have to see the truth here.
November 21, 2011 at 4:59 am
First of all, Mathews is SUPPOSED to be a REPORTER and NOT someone you sit down to interview. For MSNBC to put him out there as someone more than a REPORTER is arrogant.
Next, Obama shouldn’t have been elected the first time.
All his election showed was that the voters of this Country have been indoctrinated to “wooo” over the candidate with the best “tag” or “slogan”.
What a joke our Country has become.
Ole Hill isn’t any better than the person we have now.
November 21, 2011 at 3:09 pm
I can’t tell you what I think about Matthews! lol As for the liar in cheat and lard butt I can not believe a statment like that. What they don’t like is the exposure they aren’t happy about living in a fishbowl but as far as the WH is concerned they love it. They have been living it up like a couple of money grubbers soakingup and grabbing everything they can beg borrow and steal.
That is just theatrics in case he loses the Presidency he is setting them up so he can say we don’t care we are happy to get on with our lives.
Right! Sorry I am pretty old but not senile enought to believe that! And I am not interested in buying the brooklyn bridge either.
November 21, 2011 at 4:08 pm
Since the “super committee” failed, I have one question:
How’s that compromise thing working out for us??
From where I’m sitting, not too well.
November 22, 2011 at 6:28 pm
Was there any doubt that there would be failure!?
November 23, 2011 at 3:03 pm
Your comment has been what I have been trying to get people to understand all along.
The committee wasn’t MEANT to succeed.
NEITHER side wants the problems solved.
This is exactly why I can’t go along with the “anyone but Obama” scheme that is being used to get Romney elected.
Romney isn’t ANY better than Obama.
And this is exactly why I would like to see term limits.
With term limits, the Representatives wouldn’t have to worry about the next election. They could do what is BEST for the Country, and know that sometimes their decisions will be popular, and other times not so popular.
This so called committee, which in my opinion was simply a reason to spend even more of our money, was a “kick the can down the road” proposal from the start.
November 23, 2011 at 3:28 pm
I think hanging for treason should be instituted now that way we could remove all of them except a handful even part of the House freshmen class are guilty of voting against the Constitution.
We could have pink and blue ropes.
November 23, 2011 at 9:24 pm
I would make Friday, hangin day.
That way it would give others the weekend to contemplate the consequences of their actions.
Maybe THEN more and more would do right.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.Ben Eastaugh and Chris Sternal-Johnson.
Subscribe to feed.