You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Sharia law’ tag.

two-christians-beheaded-in-new-jersey-by-muslim-man-media-silent The Minority Report ^ | February 25, 2013 | Steve Foley

Posted on Monday, April 29, 2013 8:41:14 PM by yldstrk

Authorities in New Jersey allege a Muslim man beheaded two Coptic Christians, burying their bodies and heads and hands in separate graves near Philadelphia, bringing the horror of the persecution of Christians in Islamic nations to the United States.

According to New York’s WABC-TV, the Muslim was identified as Yusuf Ibrahim, 28. He was taken into custody after the bodies were found.

The report said investigators alleged Ibrahim killed the victims then severed their heads and hands, and buried the remains in the back yard of a home in Buena Vista, N.J.

The report said the victims were from the Coptic Christian community in the area. One of the victims had come from Egypt not many years ago.

While the report said police did not indicate a motive, friends of the victims wondered if it was something to do with religion.

(Excerpt) Read more at theminorityreportblog.com

A judge in Tampa, Florida is creating a buzz with a ruling some say shows that shariah law is creeping into the U.S. One look at the alleged ruling shows it is suspicious. But is it really an example of shariah “comin’ to America?”

According to a document on the website Jihad Watch, Circuit Court Judge Richard A. Nielsen ordered earlier this month that a civil  dispute between current and former leaders of a local mosque over who controls funds awarded during a 2008 eminent domain proceeding be decided under “Ecclesiastical Islamic Law.”

for article: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/did-shariah-law-just-work-its-way-into-a-florida-court/

from Hillbuzz.org:

There’s a website called Shariah 4 America that is calling for the destruction of the Statue of Liberty.  I hate to drive any traffic to this site but you should read what they are saying.  It  will raise the hairs on your neck and send a chill down your spine.  Here’s what they want to happen…

One of the founding principles of the Islamic constitution is to ensure that all sovereignty and supremacy belongs solely to God; the Shari’ah is a practical manifestation of this sovereignty and supremacy because it seeks to establish His command in society.

The status of a nation subsequently does not depend on its number, strength or technological advancement, but rather how much it submits to the commands of God. When a nation seeks to be free from such commands, then ultimately it will meet its destruction.

The Statue of Liberty, designed by Frederic Bartholdi, stands on Liberty Island in New York Harbor; representing Libertas, the Roman (false) goddess of Freedom, it is symbolic of the rebellious nature of the US constitution that elevates the command of man over the command of God.

In Islam, the public veneration of idols and statues is strictly prohibited. This has forced sincere Muslims to develop realistic plans that will aid in the removal of the Statue of Liberty.

Due to the scale of the task at hand, it is highly likely that rigorous safety checks will need to be employed before the demolition of the Statue of Liberty can commence; thus as a temporary measure, it is proposed that a large burkha is used to cover the statue, thereby shielding this horrendous eye sore from public view as well as sending a strong message to its French creators.

Post demolition, it is recommended that a minaret be built as a fitting replacement, allowing the glorification of God to be proclaimed daily as well as act as a powerful reminder of the superiority of Islam over all other ways of life.

 

This sounds to me like they are openly calling for a terrorist attack on our beloved Lady.

http://hillbuzz.org/2011/03/03/the-islamic-destruction-of-the-statue-of-liberty/

Note: Possible satire!

While recognizing that defendant had engaged in sexual relations with plaintiff against her expressed wishes in November 2008 and on the night of January 15 to 16, 2009, the judge did not find sexual assault or criminal sexual conduct to have been proven. He stated:

This court does not feel that, under the circumstances, that this defendant had a criminal desire to or intent to sexually assault or to sexually contact the plaintiff when he did. The court believes that he was operating under his belief that it is, as the husband, his desire to have sex when and whether he wanted to, was something that was consistent with his practices and it was something that was not prohibited. After acknowledging that this was a case in which religious custom clashed with the law, and that under the law, plaintiff had a right to refuse defendant’s advances, the judge found that defendant did not act with a criminal intent when he repeatedly insisted upon intercourse, despite plaintiff’s contrary wishes.

Having found acts of domestic violence consisting of assault and harassment to have occurred, the judge turned to the issue of whether a final restraining order should be entered. He found such an order unnecessary, vacated the temporary restraints previously entered in the matter and dismissed plaintiff’s domestic violence action….

The appellate court reversed, writing (among other things):

Defendant’s conduct in engaging in nonconsensual sexual intercourse was unquestionably knowing, regardless of his view that his religion permitted him to act as he did. As the judge recognized, the case thus presents a conflict between the criminal law and religious precepts. In resolving this conflict, the judge determined to except defendant from the operation of the State’s statutes as the result of his religious beliefs. In doing so, the judge was mistaken.

http://volokh.com/2010/07/23/cultural-defense-accepted-as-to-nonconsensual-sex-in-new-jersey-trial-court-rejected-on-appeal/

To help serve its Muslim members while adhering to their beliefs, North Jersey Federal Credit Union has designed an Islamic banking division.

Working closely with Islamic leaders and mosques to promote the new program, the $187 million CU in Totowa, N.J. is offering an NCUA-insured deposit program up to $500,000–$250,000 through the NCUA and an additional $250,000 through private Excess Share Insurance– that is consistent with the principles of Islamic law or sharia. Under sharia, Muslims are prohibited from engaging in interest payments on loans and other financial products.

Through a partnership with New England Financial, North Jersey FCU is offering Shariah Mutual Funds, in addition to sharia-compliant mortgages and home refinancing. The CU also offers interest-free checking and savings accounts.

According to North Jersey FCU, the state is home to the second largest percentage of Muslims in the country. There are more than 700,000 Muslims in Bergen County, N.J. The CU serves nearly 30,000 members.

“Like many businesses in the North Jersey area, North Jersey Federal recognizes the importance of creativity and flexibility when serving an extremely diverse population, the CU said in a statement.

http://www.cutimes.com/news/2010/6/Pages/North-Jersey-FCU-Offers-Islamic-Banking.aspx?utm_source=cutimes&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=traffic&cmpid=cutimes

Far- right Dutch MP Geert Wilders faces Muslim protest after arriving in the UK

By Kirsty Walker
Last updated at 12:57 AM on 17th October 2009

Right-wing politician Geert Wilders finally arrived in Britain yesterday to be greeted by angry protests from radical Muslims.

The Dutch MP overturned a Government ban to arrive for a brief visit guarded by a heavy police presence.

He had been barred in February amid fears he would incite violence by showing his controversial film linking the Koran to terrorism.

Muslim protesters

Muslim protesters greet Mr Wilders

For Full Story:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1220830/Far-right-Dutch-MP-Geert-Wilders-arrives-UK-winning-travel-ban-appeal.html

NOTE: Hotels in Florida and Tennessee were threatened by CAIR and other Muslim organizations if they allowed Gaeert Wilder to speak at functions.

     Barack Obama is enjoying the face time as a result of his Nobel Peace Prize awrad announcement today. The Nobel Peace Committee acknowledge his lack of accomplishments, but want to support his attempts to bring the U.S. into  line with the multinational concepts. Ironically, one of his advisors has spent the week pushing the “upside” of sharia law, and how the U.S. should be open to it:

Miss Mogahed, appointed to the President’s Council on Faith-Based and Neighbourhood Partnerships, said the Western view of Sharia was “oversimplified” and the majority of women around the world associate it with “gender justice”.

The White House adviser made the remarks on a London-based TV discussion programme hosted by Ibtihal Bsis, a member of the extremist Hizb ut Tahrir party.

The group believes in the non-violent destruction of Western democracy and the creation of an Islamic state under Sharia Law across the world.

Miss Mogahed appeared alongside Hizb ut Tahrir’s national women’s officer, Nazreen Nawaz.

During the 45-minute discussion, on the Islam Channel programme Muslimah Dilemma earlier this week, the two members of the group made repeated attacks on secular “man-made law” and the West’s “lethal cocktail of liberty and capitalism”.

They called for Sharia Law to be “the source of legislation” and said that women should not be “permitted to hold a position of leadership in government”.

“There is a reason sharia has got a bad name and it is how it has been exercised. Regrettably in the US there have been acts of injustice perpetrated against women that are driven by the Sharia-type mindset that women are objects not human beings,” she said.

She cited the example of Muzzammil Hassan, a Buffalo man who ran a cable channel aimed at countering Muslim stereotypes and was charged earlier this year with beheading his wife after she filed for divorce.

“Americans understand by example, it’s not as if we are an ignorant mass of people. Just as we don’t broad brush all Muslims, so should Dalia not downplay the serious nature of sharia law.”

For full article: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/6274387/Obama-adviser-says-Sharia-Law-is-misunderstood.html

Wal-Mart Submits: Accommodates Muslim prayer in the Workplace

CAIR is claiming victory in yet another encroachment on our freedoms in the advancement of the implementation of sharia law.

In a craven capitulation to Islamic supremacism, Wal-Mart will accommodate Muslim prayer in the workplace. It is not for us to bend to the will of Islam.

Mind you, it is not necessary for a Muslim to prayer at a certain time. These actions are merely devices in which to impose Islam on non-believers. Prayer is not required on a strict schedule and Muslim prayers are commonly “made up” after work or school. This is true even in Muslim countries, i.e., Iran.

…. prayer is not required on a strict schedule and Muslim prayers are commonly “made up” after work or school in Islamic countries including Iran, I decided to investigate the facts behind Islamic Law, foot baths and prayer requirements.

[...] Islamic authorities agree that foot baths are not required to fulfill their washing rituals prior to prayer and that provisions have been clearly defined. According to Islamic Law, you have a symbolic washing alternative or you can wash in one location and pray at another and this one washing can last you through an entire days prayers. (more here)

For Full article: http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/07/walmart-submits-accommodates-muslim-prayer-in-the-workplace.html

As part of the agreement, Walmart has agreed to send about 10 of their employees for diversity training next month that CAIR-MN is conducting, Aljabri said.

JAMES on Twitter

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 124 other followers