You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘401(k)’ tag.
Tag Archive
Feds Eye 401k’s in Debt Balancing Discussions
April 22, 2012 in Campaign 2008, Campaign 2010, Campaign 2012, Capitalism, Economy, Family values, Politics, socialism, Uncategorized | Tags: 401(k), Gale plan, Internal Revenue Service, National debt, retirement accounts | Leave a comment
Feds eye retirement-fund tax to cut $16 trillion-plus deficit New York Post ^ | 8:25 AM, April 22, 2012 | By GREGORY BRESIGER
Posted on Sunday, April 22, 2012 7:46:02 PM by DeaconBenjamin
Uncle Sam, in a desperate attempt to fix its $16 trillion-plus deficit, is leering over Americans’ retirement nest egg as its new bailout fund.
Capitol Hill politicians are assessing tax changes that could let the Internal Revenue Service lay claim to a portion of the $18 trillion sitting in 401(k) accounts and other tax breaks used by middle-class workers, including cutting the mortgage tax deduction.
A commission looking for ways to close the deficit, and, noting the extent of 401(k) tax breaks, recommends an examination of the system as one way to prevent government bankruptcy.
Besides 401(k)s, other possibilities include the mortgage-interest deduction on second homes, as well as benefits from employer-provided health insurance, which are untaxed now.
Under current 401(k) rules, total employee/employer contributions can’t exceed $50,000. In the proposed rule change, employer/employee contributions would be limited to 20 percent of the employee’s compensation, with a maximum of $20,000, the so-called 20/20 proposal.
Another proposal being discussed in Congress says all tax deductions on 401(k)s and IRAs to be replaced with an 18 percent credit. The credit, according to a proposal that has been endorsed by economist William Gale, would be placed directly in a person’s retirement account.
“Unlike the current system,” Gale told Congress, “workers’ and firms’ contributions to employer-based 401(k) accounts would no longer be excluded from income and would be subject to taxation, contributions to IRAs would no longer be tax-deductible and any contributions to a 401(k) plan would be treated as taxable income.”
In other words, the employee and employer would no longer get a deduction under the Gale plan, they would qualify for a credit. And the credit would “increase [government] revenues by about $458 billion,” Gale says.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com …
SEIU Wants to Manage your 401-K
March 25, 2010 in Campaign 2008, Campaign 2010, Campaign 2012, Capitalism, Economy, Family values, Politics, socialism, Uncategorized | Tags: 401(k), Andy Stern, Barack Obama, Centralized retirement systems, SEIU, socialism | 2 comments
Bend Over America: Now The SEIU Wants Your 401k!
Having ruined the pension funds of Americans nationally through corrupt and utterly unsustainable “projections” of future growth labor unions are now targeting your money to make up the difference:
One of the nation’s largest labor unions, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), is promoting a plan that will centralize all retirement plans for American workers, including private 401(k) plans, under one new “retirement system” for the United States.
In effect, government pensions for everyone, not unlike the European system and regardless of personal choice.
Yes, because labor unions have done such a great job of managing their pension plans, right?
For full article: http://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/2121-Bend-Over-America-Now-The-SEIU-Wants-Your-401k!.html
Government Control of your 401(k); More class warfare
February 22, 2010 in Campaign 2008, Campaign 2010, Campaign 2012, Capitalism, Economy, Family values, Politics, socialism, Uncategorized | Tags: 401(k), budget deficits, retirement planning, Social Security Trust funds, US Treasuries | 1 comment
Should the federal government be able to decide where and how your 401(k) contributions will be invested?
Pros? Cons?
