Mother, 37, w/ 15 Childrens Says “We” are Not Doing ENOUGH for Her
December 2, 2011 in Campaign 2008, Campaign 2012, Economy, Family values, Politics, socialism, Uncategorized | Tags: Barack Obama, nanny state, unemployment, welfare
A Blog for Open Discourse
December 2, 2011 in Campaign 2008, Campaign 2012, Economy, Family values, Politics, socialism, Uncategorized | Tags: Barack Obama, nanny state, unemployment, welfare

3 comments
Comments feed for this article
December 3, 2011 at 3:25 pm
Interested Bystander
Hey All,
Wow……………..just wow
It’s worse than I thought.
December 5, 2011 at 5:02 pm
Interested Bystander
Hey All,
JAMES,
Why no threads on Cain?
You have always been very kind to me, allowing me to express my opinions on many subjects not on topic.
I would like to comment on this article:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/12/05/ginger-white-herman-cain-accuser-on-his-exit-his-arrogance-and-sex.html
After reading this article and digesting what I read, I can’t help to come to some opinions:
1. Where is these two kids’ father? White says that her first husband fathered both her children, so why isn’t HE helping her put her kids through school? She says she has been married THREE times, and White was her first, so why does she have his last name?
2. The article says that she was invloved in a sexual harassment suit, and that it was “settled”. Why didn’t the interviewer go in to depth about something so similar to the charges being leveled at Cain? Seems to me that since she had a similar incident, and that the issue was “settled”, the interviewer would ask her questions to get her “take” on how it was “settled”.
3. The article also suggests that White was having sex with OTHER men for money, just as she claims she was with Cain. Where are these other men? Why won’t she give up the names of these other men, so the media can ruin THEIR lives also, or at least collaborate HER story?
4. It sure does seem to me that this woman was no more than a hooker. Giving men sex for money, or even suggesting that she felt obliged to give up sex, because she was being “helped” financially, is the definition of being a hooker. Why wasn’t she asked about this? And NOT being helped exclusively by Cain either, she admitted in the article that there were other men who helped her out financially for sex.
Overall, I just can NOT see why anyone would want to go through what candidates have to go through. There are things in everyone’s past that would be embarrassing, and if the media decided to harp on this ONE instance, it would be the demise of their efforts.
But she NEVER messed around on her husbands, she made it a point to make that known. Yeah right.
I’m just not very impressed with this latest accuser.
December 6, 2011 at 1:37 pm
JAMES
My apologies on the lack of Cain posts.
I have been extremely busy with other matters, and feel that I have neglected the posts. But we will work on that!
I am not sure whether or not Cain had these issues, but I do believe that there is a trail of money from some nefarous source to each of the accusers.
Just sayin!!!