The following 75 names are confirmed members of the now-defunct JournoList listserv.
1. Ezra Klein – Washington Post, Newsweek, The American Prospect
2. Dave Weigel – Washington Post, MSNBC, The Washington Independent
3. Matthew Yglesias – Center for American Progress, The Atlantic Monthly
4. David Dayen – FireDogLake
5. Spencer Ackerman – Wired, FireDogLake, Washington Independent, Talking Points Memo, The American Prospect
6. Jeffrey Toobin – CNN, The New Yorker
7. Eric Alterman – The Nation, Media Matters for America
8. Paul Krugman – The New York Times, Princeton University
9. John Judis – The New Republic, The American Prospect
10. Eve Fairbanks – The New Republic
11. Mike Allen – POLITICO
12. Ben Smith – POLITICO
13. Lisa Lerer – POLITICO
14. Joe Klein – TIME
15. Brad DeLong – The Economists’ Voice, University of California at Berkley
16. Chris Hayes – The Nation
17. Matt Duss – Center for American Progress
18. Jonathan Chait – The New Republic
19. Jesse Singal – The Boston Globe, Washington Monthly
20. Michael Cohen – New America Foundation
21. Isaac Chotiner – The New Republic
22. Katha Pollitt – The Nation
23. Alyssa Rosenberg – Washingtonian, The Atlantic, Government Executive
24. Rick Perlstein – Author, Campaign for America’s Future
25. Alex Rossmiller – National Security Network
26. Ed Kilgore – Democratic Stategist
27. Walter Shapiro – PoliticsDaily.com
28. Noam Scheiber – The New Republic
29. Michael Tomasky – The Guardian
30. Rich Yeselson – Change to Win
31. Tim Fernholz – American Prospect
32. Dana Goldstein – The Daily Beast
33. Jonathan Cohn – The New Republic
34. Scott Winship – Pew Economic Mobility Project
35. David Roberts – Grist
36. Luke Mitchell – Harper’s Magazine
37. John Blevins – South Texas College of Law
38. Moira Whelan – National Security Network
39. Henry Farrell – George Washington University
40. Josh Bearman – LA Weekly
41. Alec McGillis – Washington Post
42. Greg Anrig – The Century Foundation
43. Adele Stan – The Media Consortium
44. Steven Teles – Yale University
45. Harold Pollack – University of Chicago
46. Adam Serwer – American Prospect
47. Ryan Donmoyer – Bloomberg
48. Seth Michaels – MyDD.com
49. Kate Steadman – Kaiser Health News
50. Michael Scherer – TIME
51. Laura Rozen – Politico, Mother Jones
52. Jesse Taylor – Pandagon.net
53. Michael Hirsh – Newsweek
54. Daniel Davies – The Guardian
55. Jonathan Zasloff – UCLA
56. Richard Kim – The Nation
57. Thomas Schaller – Baltimore Sun
58. Jared Bernstein – Economic Policy Institute
59. Holly Yeager – Columbia Journalism Review
60. Joe Conason – The New York Observer
61. David Greenberg – Slate
62. Todd Gitlin – Columbia University
63. Mark Schmitt – American Prospect
64. Kevin Drum – Washington Monthly
65. Sarah Spitz – NPR
66. Jonathan Stein – Mother Jones
67. Daniel Levy – Century Foundation
68. Ben Adler – Newsweek, POLITICO
69. Avi Zenilman – POLITICO
70. Suzanne Nossel – Human Rights Watch
71. Nick Baumann – Mother Jones
72. Ryan Avent – Economist
72. Greg Sargent – Washington Post
73. Gautham Nagesh – The Hill, Daily Caller
74. Foster Kamer – The Village Voice
75. David Corn – Mother Jones
They are listed in the order in which I was able to confirm their participation through the following sources.
Sources:
The Death of JournoList: Does Privacy End at the Edge of Your Thoughts?
(http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/06/25/the-death-of-journolist-does-privacy-end-at-the-edge-of-your-th/)
JournoList: Inside the echo chamber
(http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0309/20086.html)
After “JournoList”
(http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2010/06/after-journolist)
The Secret Liberal Journalist Cabal [Hot Air]
(http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/17/politico-the-secret-liberal-journalist-cabal/)
JournoList Revealed! Inside the Secret Liberal Media Email Cabal
(http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/kausfiles/archive/2009/03/26/journolist-revealed-inside-the-liberal-media-email-cabal.aspx)
Who Doesn’t Love The JournoList?
(http://justoneminute.typepad.com/main/2009/03/who-doesnt-love-the-journolist.html)
On Journolist and Dave Weigel
(http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/michaeltomasky/2010/jun/25/usa)
The Inside Scoop on JournoList
(http://www.frumforum.com/the-inside-scoop-on-journolist)
Tim Fernholz
(http://twitter.com/TimFernholz)
Dana Goldstein
(http://twitter.com/DanaGoldstein)
Math Lesson For The JournOList: 60 More Than 50
(http://www.talkleft.com/story/2009/9/22/142845/064?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TalkleftThePoliticsOfCrime+%28TalkLeft%3A+The+Politics+of+Crime%29)
Responding to John Hawkins
(http://www.frumforum.com/responding-to-john-hawkins)
Obama wins! And Journolisters rejoice
(http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/21/obama-wins-and-journolisters-rejoice/)
A few excerpts from JournoList journalists
(http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/21/a-few-excerpts-from-journolist-journalists/)
Documents show media plotting to kill stories about Rev. Jeremiah Wright
(http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/20/documents-show-media-plotting-to-kill-stories-about-rev-jeremiah-wright/)
When McCain picked Palin, liberal journalists coordinated the best line of attack
(http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/22/when-mccain-picked-palin-liberal-journalists-coordinated-the-best-line-of-attack/)
Tucker Carlson: We will not publish full J-List emails
(http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/07/tucker_carlson_we_will_not_pub.html)
You shall know them by their work
(http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/07/first_time_as_tragedy_second_t_1.html)
The Tucker Carlson Journolist-Disclosure Email Exchange
(http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2010/07/the_tucker_carl.php)
Confessions of a Journolister
(http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/07/journolist-daily-caller-sarah-palin)
19 comments
Comments feed for this article
July 24, 2010 at 6:59 pm
Stothes
So, is there any sort of proof that every single journalist on this list conspired to bury the irrelevant Wright story or are they just automatically guilty by association for being apart of the same message board?
July 24, 2010 at 7:04 pm
JAMES
Read their comments. Deflect the story. Label “anyone on the right as a racist”. It is one thing for them to have their opinions and beliefs, but for those who are reporters, not opinion columnists, to put their views above the news story is simply wrong and manipulative. That goes for either the left or the right.
July 25, 2010 at 9:22 am
Stothes
I think you missed my question, James. Did every journalist on this list conspire to bury the Wright bit?
July 24, 2010 at 7:06 pm
JAMES
And you consider one’s religious “mentor”, or spiritual mentor as Obama referred to Wright, to be “irrelevant”. How is it irrelevant that Obama and his racist wife sat in the pews of the Black Liberation theology church of Rev. Wright and in no way espouse his views or the views of black liberation theology?
July 25, 2010 at 9:30 am
Stothes
Yes, I find it irrelevant. The Bush family has personal ties with the bin Ladens. Does that mean the Bush’s are Islamic terrorists? Palin has ties to the Alaskan Independence Party. Does that mean she’s a secessionist?
July 25, 2010 at 3:32 pm
JAMES
your source for the bin Laden statement? Did they have personal ties with Osama bin Laden?
July 25, 2010 at 5:50 pm
Stothes
No, they didn’t have personal ties with Osama….just his family. The point I was trying to make is that this guilt by association thing is ridiculous. You can’t accuse everyone on journolist of trying to bury the Jeremiah Wright story just Spencer Ackerman and a handful of others made some dumb comments.
July 26, 2010 at 3:06 am
Interested Bystander
Stothes,
You mean this “guilt by association” also applies to those in the media who are reporting about the Tea Party folks being “racist”?
I find this whole thing very interesting because of the double standard.
FOX News is vilified for reporting on the tape of the Sherrod lady, but interestingly, FOX didn’t report it until AFTER she was fired or asked to resign or whatever happened there.
The news STILL reports that there were racial words yelled on the day the health care takeover bill was passed, even though there is tape of the members walking through the crowd, and not an utter of the “n” word. If it happened there would be video of it, and it would be broadcast over and over.
Same goes for the congressman who says he was “spat” on while walking in to the Capital. Truth is, there IS video of this, and it is quite clear from the tape, that it was a matter of “say it don’t spray it”, and NOT someone who hockered up and spit a luggie in the congressman’s face. But yet the media STILL reports that racial epitaphs were yelled, and that the congressman was “spit” on.
Or how about how the media portrayed Rush Limbaugh when he tried to buy the Rams? The media ran the story in to the ground, and FORCED football to say no to Rush. Sport is full of folks like Rush, Al Davis, Steinbrenner, and Bob Ursay come to mind, and I’m sure there are many others.
You commented this:
“You can’t accuse everyone on journolist of trying to bury the Jeremiah Wright story just Spencer Ackerman and a handful of others made some dumb comments.”
Then why wasn’t the story REPORTED? The articles and TV reports on EVERY network except FOX, “pooh poohed” this off, said there was no evidence that Obama was in the church at the time of the few “snippets” we heard. But what about all of the sermons the Rev gave when Obama WAS in church? I can’t imagine they were too much different from the “snippets” we saw. I would predict that if you took a poll while walking down the street, simply asking if they knew who Jeremiah Wright is, they would say that they have heard the name, but they wouldn’t know why they had heard the name.
However, if a Republican candidate had attended a church with a Pastor as radical as Wright IS, EVERYONE would know the name of the Pastor, and probably the name of the church.
For Obama to have distanced himself from Wright, only shows how much of a spineless coward we have as President.
Why is it that the media shows pictures of the BP Chairman out on his sail boat, and that costs him his job, but yet our President (who said that he would not “rest” until the Gulf was back , oh no, that was BETTER than it was before this disaster), is allowed to go on not one, but TWO vacations, and the media treats it like Obama needs the “rest”?
The hypocrisy of our media is unquestionable. The indoctrination that they are TRYING to force upon us is unquestionable.
For you to defend these “journolists” is puzzling to me. You seem to be a pretty level headed person, but yet you “defend” these guys plotting how the outcome of the last election could be influenced?
What’s up with that?
July 24, 2010 at 8:14 pm
Journolist: All 107 Members With Their ‘News’ Affiliations | MorallyRight.org
[...] Some of the JournoList Members who Made Coordinated Efforts to use … [...]
July 26, 2010 at 2:29 am
Interested Bystander
Hey All,
The truth is that when people get together like these foks did, and try to influence our thoughts, THAT is indoctrination.
HRD is a perfect example of this.
It’s too bad reporters don’t REPORT anymore. I suppose you could blame it on their professors in college, but these men are grown, and know better. It is their choice to try and influence the vulnerable.
The sad part is that it works.
July 26, 2010 at 8:09 am
HistorianDude
IB really has a bug up his butt regarding me. He brings me up even in threads I haven’t contributed to.
Its creepy, in an Internet stalker kind of way.
July 26, 2010 at 11:11 am
Interested Bystander
HRD,
The first step to recovery is admission.
Problem is, you actually believe the crap you spew, because you have been indoctrinated.
YOU are one of those “vulnerable” I commented about.
July 26, 2010 at 11:13 am
Interested Bystander
Hey HRD,
Have you seen the video of Chris Mathews calling our President “OCarter”?
Even those doing the indoctrination slip up now and then.
July 26, 2010 at 2:59 pm
gumply
Hi James,
Just wanted to remind you that the list is all over the place and it is sort of condeming in itself that no one on the list has come forward to complain that their name was on the list erroneously. Their all under their favorite rock trying to protect their a$$.
The state run media is just that, the state run media.
July 26, 2010 at 3:08 pm
JAMES
Absolutely true!!
July 26, 2010 at 6:31 pm
gumply
James,
Just want to add another bit to the conversation. Bush knew Osama Bin Laden well enough to fund him in some of his enterprises. It runs in the family. grandpa Preston Bush was a Nazi sympathizer and directed money to Hitler in World War 11. Daddy Bush has been kissing it up to the saudi royal family for years when little osama was bouncing on his mommy’s knee. They probably played tag together or something like that when they were kiddo’s.
Don’t pay any attention to the obots they believe anything they are told to believe, they never were much for seeking out the truth.
Cheers!
November 19, 2010 at 1:25 am
Sailing
Add:
David S. Meyer, “Author and professor of Sociology and Political Science at the University of California, Irvine” so his website says about himself.
He also claims on that site to be a member of Journolist.
http://politicsoutdoors.com/author/politicsoutdoors/
July 19, 2011 at 5:32 am
Cicero Zometa
In following the current News of the World hacking investigations in UK the JournoList Conspiracy came to mind. In the UK the issue is using illegal means to obtain accurate information on high profile stories. The Journolist Conspirators used false allegations and suppression of negative facts about Obama to help him win the Presidency. The Journolist Conspirators totaled 75 Journalist from dozens of top networks, working in collusion to deceive the American Public. They were all guilty but never prosecuted and are still working. Murdoch, on the other hand, is being accused, tried and found guilty in the same news networks that were involved in the Journolist Conspiracy.
April 27, 2012 at 3:25 pm
Bob
Wow, it looks like a Tel Aviv phone book.