Is it at all appropriate for the executive branch of the US government to be an official contact and co-operator for any specific political party website?
Anyway, thanks to Gateway Pundit picking up on the spinoff link at LGF, the disgusting sewage that passes for organizing at the DNC and the White House has been flushed down the memory hole. Score one for the Blogosphere!
Have no fear. We cached it here. Below is an excerpt of what the DNC-White House don’t want you to see.
All 50 States are coordinating in this – as we fight back against our own Right-Wing Domestic Terrorists who are subverting the American Democratic Process, whipped to a frenzy by their Fox Propaganda Network ceaselessly re-seizing power for their treacherous leaders.
—* RECLAIM OUR LAND FROM THE HEIRS OF, YES: BIN LADEN *—* YOU KNOW IT’S TRUE *—
On one level, we want to praise the DNC-White House operators of barackobama.com for removing this offensive trash, but it is faint praise if any.
The DNC should take responsibility for the content they facilitate, and invest in some editors to keep their crazies from having such wide access to DNC-White House sponsored PR platforms. That way, this kind of pornographically offensive hate speech will not end up being broadcast in the first place.
Lone bloggers should not have to police the DNC-White House website for this kind of language. They should be embarrassed that their process are so sloppy as to allow this hate speech to appear with their tacit, if temporary, approval.
For full article:
http://www.foundingbloggers.com/wordpress/2009/09/update-barackobama-comsewer-deletes-offensive-post/
2 comments
Comments feed for this article
September 2, 2009 at 3:55 am
Ace
This doesn’t bother me much because frankly these alleged democrats should feel terrorized by the American People. The American People are their biggest threat; their greatest enemy. Sure, the language is vulgar and sophomoric. However, it is also very perceptive. The American People most assuredly are their enemy.
September 2, 2009 at 1:37 pm
Interested Bystander
JAMES,
This is a bit off topic, but it needs to be commented;
Jerry Nadler says in this interview that it is the “obligation” of CIA interrogators to question the validity of orders given them, when they feel the orders are unlawful:
Now jump to earlier this year when Major Cook questioned Obama’s lawfulness to give orders, and people on here were calling him all kinds of names including “unpatriotic”.
So which is it? Are you patriotic when you question orders given that you believe are unlawful, or is it unpatriotic?
Seems like we have two situations, and when it is a Republican, the questions are legit, but if it is a Democrat, then you should just follow the orders whether you believe they are lawful or not.
Double standard?