For many months, Larry Sinclair has tried to get the Obama campaign to acknowledge the Senator’s drug use with him in 1999. He has tried to get the media to hear his story and investigate it. He has endured, along with his family, personal attacks that have included intimidation of his mother, the cessation of his disability income, and his arrest precipitated by a bogus claim pushed through a Delaware grand jury at the behest of Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden, whose father was rewarded for his cooperation in this matter by being named as Obama’s running mate.
Late yesterday, in an illegal activity that will make Watergate look like child’s play, BOTH of Larry Sinclair’s email accounts, through AOL and HotMail, were hacked into and ALL emails removed. That was then followed by the complete elimination of all of the postings on Larry Sinclair’s blogsites. In addition to that, the site that started the Larry Sinclair story rolling, YouTube, removed his videos and closed his account. Of course, all of this was preceded by the Blogspot radio completely erasing his entire radio show and archives without any warning.
The email accounts were obviously attacked to garner the information that had been sent to Sinclair. Months of speculation by the Sinclair naysayers have pointed to various groups that the naysayers believed were behind the Sinclair movement. Although Sinclair has made it abundantly clear that he was not an operative for anyone, the internet Obama thugs have tried to attach him to anyone they could, from Hillary Clinton to John McCain.
Even as I post this, Larry Sinclair is in the process of getting the sites restored, and continuing to get the message out.
Larry Sinclair, “Taking It To the Streets”
So, if Larry Sinclair’s story is not true, WHY THE MAJOR CONCERTED EFFORT to make sure it is stopped NOW ?? Why not Phil Berg’s story, or TexasDarlin’s blogs? Why not NoQuartersUSA?
Looks like it’s going to get even bumpier !!
3 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 12, 2008 at 5:28 pm
Chisholm
James,
“Looks like it’s going to get even bumpier !!”
You may be right. Apparently Ben Smith at Politico is sitting on a story. Ace of Spades also makes reference to this.
http://hillbuzz.wordpress.com/2008/10/12/why-is-ben-smith-sitting-on-a-story-he-wont-print-baby-wed-sure-love-to-figure-it-out/
October 13, 2008 at 5:11 am
cococal
Ben Smith denies “sitting on a story”
“”Sitting on it
It’s a commonplace of political campaigns that each side believes there’s a dark secret in the other candidate’s past that, if disclosed, would bring him down. Once in a while, that’s true.
But in any case, my email has been lighting up today with the blogospheric rumor that one Ben Smith of Politico.com is suppressing the ultimate Obama story. This seems to have popped first on the diehard Hillary blog Hillbuzz, which writes:
Our guess is that he, like most journalists, don’t want to break any stories that will hurt Obama – until after the election. Journalists are clearly rooting for Obama in this election. They have invested themselves heavily in his success.
“Of course he’s sitting on it,” chimes in Ace.
Neither specifies the story I’m suppressing, and I hate to disappoint, either on the big-story or the media-conspiracy fronts, but fear I must.
I, like most reporters, chase a lot of tips; I’ve made calls on plausible stories that, if confirmed, would damage one candidate or the other. But while the blogosphere sometimes reports by starting with a tip or a theory (Obama didn’t write his own book! Palin didn’t bear her own child!) and testing it by making it public, I’m old-fashioned enough not to print what I can’t confirm. I’m not even entirely sure which of the tips I’ve chased those blogs are referring to (if this rumor has any basis in reality at all), though I have a guess.
In any case, thanks for all the email. And for the tips.”"
By Ben Smith 09:42 PM
October 13, 2008 at 9:29 am
Larse12
Larry is up and running again after some people hacked into his site!!