JAMES

Who Shall be our “Wilberforce”?

In Politics, Uncategorized on August 5, 2008 at 3:54 pm

WILLIAM WILBERFORCE (1759-1833) was a British politician and philanthropist who served in Parliament from 1780 to 1812. As a child, he was a close friend of Sir William Pitt, who would later become the Prime Minister. What makes the story, the biography of William Wilberforce is the nature and demeanor in which this man chose to pursue his political career.

William Wilberforce

In 1784, after just four years in the Parliament, Wilberforce became an independent, and continued to hold his Parliamentary seat. It was at this time, during a trip through Europe, that the young Wilberforce underwent a spiritual conversion that lead him to more deeply and intuitively examine his life, his past, his future, and his commitment to God.

It was in this spiritual conversion that Wilberforce saw that there were injustices that were not being addressed, primarily, the slave trade that the British empire was actively involved in. He began to meet, firstly secretly, with leaders in the anti-slavery movement. He began submitting legislation toward the abolishment of the slave trade, which, understandably for the era, was met with great opposition.

Year after year, Wilberforce faced the challenges, and the ridicule, pursuing and championing a cause that the majority would not embrace. His close friend and confidante, Sir William Pitt, was also an abolishinist, who himself sought to aid Wilberforce’s cause. The eventual outcome was the abolishment of the slave trade.

What makes the William Wilberforce story somewhat unique was that, at the time of his spiritual conversion, in an era where one’s religious beliefs were private in nature when publicized, would make one subject to ridicule, Wilberforce first questioned his role in public life, and then, embracing the challenge, would not permit his religious beliefs to diminish his belief in his legislative goals. His politics had to embrace his religious convictions, and vice-versa. Subject often to the contempt of his peers, to the point that he became ill, Wilberforce was relentless in the support of the various causes he championed.

To understand Wilberforce’s impact on moral reform, abolishment of slavery, prison reform, and other social causes of the day, the movie Amazing Grace provides a glance into Wilberforce’s struggle to balance his religious ideals with his social goals. (Note: The movie was released in 2007 to coincide with the 200th anniversary of the 1807 act to abolish slavery).

So, the question for today, for those who want to be our leaders, is, who will be our Wilberforce?

While our founding fathers, like Washington, Adams, Jefferson, and Madison, may have pursued their goals with idealism and passion of Wilberforce, the “business” of politics has long changed that in America. It is time that we have a leader come forward who does not “flip-flop” on the issues, a leader who is not afraid to face the controversy head on, a leader who accepts the challenges but is unfaltering on his principles and values. The challenge before us is who before us is our Wilberforce? Who can step up to accept the challenge of our economy, our decaying moral values as a country as a whole, our fuel crisis, our war on terrorism, and our place in the global marketplace, and face this challenge without compromising his principles and values?

With all truth and honesty, I am not sure that either John McCain or Barack Obama could come even remotely close to being William Wilberforce, and I’m not sure who presently would be able to meet that challenge. It is time that we begin to demand this standard of our leaders.

  1. James,

    Good post.

    Those days of standing up for what you believe in has gone by the wayside. Sad to say, but even if someone did, they would be lagging way behind in the polls. Perot tried this, and got what 13%? People are not interested in fixing our problems. Not saying it’s right, just reality.

  2. That is the problem with professional politicians. Our forefathers created a government “of the people, by the people, for the people”, but that is no longer the reason they go into politics– it is what they can get out of it.

  3. You are so right James. That is why I agree with term limits. We need new blood every now and again. It would put the representatives in a position to actually get things done instead of worried about staying in DC. Maybe stagger when the newbies would be elected. Half every 2 years for the House. 4 year limit for the House, and 12 year limit for the Senate. Maybe only a one term limit for the Senate. There is a 10 year limit for President already. Way too many career politicians. I would love to have their health care and retirement packages that they voted in for themselves.

    Maybe that would be a way to get back to the basics, and have elections that actually mean something. Solve our problems. Pelosi is a 20+ year representative, and I would venture that she hasn’t authored a good piece of legislation in all of her career, but yet she is third in line for President. She’s a disgrace to let the Congress go on vacation instead of staying in session until a vote on off-shore drilling took place. She has the power to do this. She’s a coward. Just like the Democratic nominee for President.

    But the fact is, she will probably be reelected by a wide margin. Shows how ignorant the electorate are. It’s sad.

  4. One or two terms max for Congressmen, but their terms should be 3 years. Senators could be one or two terms, but shorten their terms to 4 years. Originally, the senators were the “elite” of each state, and the six year term (2 more than the Presidency) carried some significance.

    The President should be a long single term, 6,8, maybe 10 years. The changes in the Congress would help alleviate the “lame duck” concept. Four years is not quite enough time to make positive policies when the idea of reelection looming.

    I would LOVE to see Pelosi lose in November, since she has not delivered on the electorate mandate from 2006.

All comments are screened for appropriateness. Commenting is a privilege, not a right. Good comments will be cherished, bad comments will be deleted.